Presidential Election Goes From Bad to Worse

Note

Since this was written, the U.S. presidential election has gone from worse to far worse due to Joseph Biden’s disastrous performance in the June 27 debate with Donald Trump. Though I am no expert on these matters, Biden seemed to show signs of dementia. Dementia is not at all unusual for a man of his age. 

All types of dementia are progressive, which means they get steadily worse over time. It’s hard to see how Biden will be able to serve as president until January 20, 2029.

The Democrats are discussing whether they should dump Biden—which would seem to be a no–brainer—and how to do that. As things stand, there appears to be almost nothing between Donald Trump and the White House. The truth is that the U.S. political system is ill-designed to handle this type of situation. I will have more to say on this next month.

Read more …

2 thoughts on “Presidential Election Goes From Bad to Worse

  1. Sam, I really enjoy these articles. When discussing money’s role in the anarchy of production, you said:

    Crises of overproduction are not accidental. As production is unplanned, there’s no way to control the amount of money material production needed to meet circulation demands. If production were planned, there’d be no need for money material at all. The laws regulating it work through the anarchy of capitalist production.

    But what if the U.S. or any state for that matter were to nationalize the gold industry while keeping production unplanned otherwise? Would the state not then be able to create whatever effective monetary demand is necessitated by the market? My thoughts are that it would, but that this would in turn create new contradictions. For example, would this create full employment, and if so, how would rising wages resulting from it be resolved? I would love to hear your thoughts on this.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.