War, Oil, and the Jewish Question

Commentators point to the rise in oil prices driven by the Strait of Hormuz closure and damage to the refineries in the Persian Gulf region as the main force driving up inflation. They say it will cause a return to a 1970s-type stagflation — high inflation, economic stagnation and unemployment — and deep recession. Others predict that if the current ceasefire ends in renewed war this will cause a world Depression (with a capital D) worse than even the 1930s.

How much truth is there in these predictions? Historically, a war did not precede the 1930s Great Depression to drive up the prices of various commodities. True, the high commodity prices in general relative to commodity values and production prices played a crucial role in putting the “Great” in that economic crisis and Depression. Could something similar happen as a result of the current war, even though it has not yet reached the scale of World War I?

Early in this blog, in examining the causes of crises, we explored the theory of disproportionate production that arises out of the anarchy of capitalist production. The main question political economy dealt with was not explaining why it occurred in an unplanned capitalist system, but how the proportions needed to continue production are achieved at all. In reality, disproportionate production occurs and has occurred almost every minute throughout the history of capitalist production. At any given moment, some commodities are overproduced relative to others, while some commodities are underproduced. When one kind of commodity is underproduced, its market prices rise above its value, or more strictly, its production price. When overproduced, a commodity’s market price falls below its value and production price.

Read more …

Economy and War

Update April 13

After five weeks of the United States and Israel bombing Iran, as its neighboring oil monarchies collaborated in the attacks, it became clear from the viewpoint of the Trump administration that the war wasn’t going anywhere. There was talk that the U.S. might seize one or more Iranian islands, though even if successful, this would have achieved little. A full-scale invasion of Iran, meaning a march on Tehran, is out of the question at the current time.

Iran is a country of around 93 million people. This is larger than the German population of 80 million at the time of the U.S. invasion of Western Europe and Germany in 1944-1945. In geographical size, Iran is about the size of Western Europe. And of course, there is no equivalent to the armed forces of the Soviet Union attacking from the other side. This means that a “march on Tehran” like the march on Baghdad in 2003 is ruled out. If attempted, this would be the largest foreign military operation by the U.S. since 1945 and possibly larger. This would require, at the least, a full-scale mobilization with a renewed military draft.

In 1944-45, the U.S. enjoyed the support of most of the non-German Western European population, who did not want to be ruled by Nazi Germany. This certainly would not be the case in any attempted “march on Tehran” today. There are other differences as well, that are not in the U.S.’s favor. In 1944-45, U.S. industry was, relative to that of other countries, at its historic peak. Today, the U.S. lags far behind China. The effects of the long-term decline are being felt as the U.S. and its extension, the Zionist entity, are running low on munitions. Unlike before, when the U.S. dollar was rock solid, the dollar has been plunging against gold. The dollar price of gold was above $5,000 per ounce when the war began on February 28, and the Trump administration was forced to accept a two-week ceasefire on April 8. Talks to find a permanent end to the war began in Pakistan on April 11 and collapsed the next day when the U.S. insisted that Iran give up its entire nuclear power industry.

The U.S. then announced it was blockading all trade through the Strait of Hormuz, effective April 13. This is an Act of War by the United States against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Whether this will lead to a resumption of large-scale military action and what form it may take is unknown as of the time of this writing on April 13, 8:36 a.m., Pacific time. It appears that the Trump administration is hoping that by preventing Iran from selling oil on the world market, it will be forced to surrender to U.S. demands.

Read more …

Gold, Oil, and the Road to War

On Friday, Feb. 28, 2026, the government of Donald Trump, along with the Zionist entity, launched a full-scale military assault on Iran. Trump indicated that, as he did during the so-called 12-day war in June 2025, the attack aimed at killing top Iranian leaders.

This time, the targets included Iran’s “supreme leader” — as the expression is translated in the West — Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The 86-year-old was the religious leader of Shia Islam based in Iran, and other Muslims respected him as well. Millions of Iranians were outraged, as millions of Catholics and other Christians would be if a powerful nation bombed the Vatican to kill the pope. A U.S. airstrike on a girls’ elementary school killed, according to one estimate, almost 170 people, mostly schoolgirls. A brilliant example of U.S. military technology and power!?!

In addition to joining the assault, the Zionist entity has gone even further. It launched a massive attack on Lebanon, intending to drive out all Arab people from the southern part of the country. If that isn’t enough, it tightened its food blockade against Gaza, escalating the genocide, while the assault on Iran diverts the attention of the world. The war on Iran raises many questions, including the relationship between the Zionist entity, the so-called State of Israel, and the U.S.-NATO world empire.

Read more …

The Historical Limits of Capital: From Stagflation to Artificial Intelligence

Recent media speculation has focused on whether 79-year-old President Donald Trump is experiencing cognitive decline, echoing similar coverage of his predecessor, Joseph Biden.

They’re the oldest men to have held the office. As people age, they become more vulnerable to the group of brain changes we call dementia. I’m not qualified to assess anyone’s health; what matters here is what these stories signal politically — confusion, factionalism, and instability at the top of the state.

At times, it seems that Trump has no coherent foreign policy. There are stories he’s pressuring Euromaidan Ukraine to settle the war with Russia on Russian terms. Then it seems that settlement talks go nowhere.

Read more …

Palestine

On October 9, a new ceasefire in Gaza was announced. The last one took effect in January 2025 as Donald Trump assumed office. Many hoped this was the end of the Gaza genocide.

In March, the genocide resumed as Trump and Zionist entity leaders made clear their aims included the complete removal of the Palestinian population from Gaza. Kept open was whether this process was through ethnic cleansing or physical annihilation (literal genocide).

Physical annihilation was achieved by killing through mass bombing, cutting off food and water, causing manufactured famine, and disease.

Read more …

Marxism versus Individual Terror

On September 10, far-right youth group Turning Point USA leader Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a sniper at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. The FBI arrested 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who turned himself in at the urging of his family. Turning Point USA specializes in organizing far-right youth to support the Republican Party and Donald Trump. Kirk was a thorough-going bigot who specialized in baiting African Americans, Muslims, women’s rights activists, gays, trans people, leftists, progressives and liberals. He also made anti-Semitic remarks that in no way excluded his strong support for Zionism.

Read more …

Gaza Genocide Resumes as U.S. Wages War on Yemen

On March 17, the Gaza genocide resumed, first the blockade and then the bombing. It appears we are back where we were under Genocide Joe Biden. Up until then, Trump was better for the Palestinian people in one sense. After his election, negotiations paused the genocide. The pause began on January 19, the day before he became president.

Now the only difference is that, in theory, the Biden administration supported the so-called two-state solution that had been Washington’s official policy since 1993, with the Oslo Accords. The West Bank and the Gaza Strip would form a separate Palestinian state, while the rest of historic Palestine would belong to the Zionist entity, the Jewish State of Israel. Biden insisted that Gaza’s Hamas administration be replaced by the rule of the notorious collaborationist Palestinian Authority, under Mahmoud Abbas, who has acted as a Zionist agent. The Biden administration, like its predecessors, opposed anything like (bourgeois) democratic rule in Gaza.

Though he supported this approach in his first administration, Trump has now junked it. He’s made it clear that all Palestinians will have to leave Gaza, promising they will enjoy a wonderful life somewhere outside Palestine. In addition, the U.S. would own Gaza, transforming it into some kind of hotel casino resort, owned by U.S. capitalists that would include the Trump Organization itself.

Read more …

Genocide Joe

On Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2025, five days before Donald Trump took office, an agreement was announced for a ceasefire to take effect the following Sunday, Jan. 19. President-elect Trump sent Steve Witoff, like Trump a New York City real estate magnate, to negotiate — or rather, lay down the law — to the Netanyahu regime.

When Israeli leaders protested that it was Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, Witoff, who is Jewish, swept these pious objections aside. He said that the Netanyahu regime would have to agree to terms established the previous May.

None of the tricks that worked under Trump’s predecessor to stop a ceasefire worked this time. It was an offer the Zionist entity could not refuse.

Read more …

Gang Warfare

For weeks following Israel’s murder of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran on July 31, the world wondered if (and when) Iran would retaliate. Haniyeh was heavily involved in diplomatic activity to end Israel’s genocidal bombing in Gaza. He had been in Tehran for the inauguration of Iran’s new president, Masoud Pezehkian.

Iran was widely expected to react by launching a drone and missile counterattack on Israel as in April, but this time to causing greater damage. Much to the surprise of most observers, Iran took no military action. It seems that the Iranian leaders were engaged in intense diplomatic activity to arrange a ceasefire to end, or at least suspend, Israel’s genocidal bombing campaign on Gaza.

Hezbollah, the Lebanese political-religious resistance organization, was also negotiating for a ceasefire. Its leader, Hassan Nasrallah, was one of the most popular and respected political leaders in Lebanon.

Read more …

Student Protests Against U.S.-Supported Israeli Genocide Spread Globally

Building since October 2023, the final weeks of April 2024 saw an explosion of student protests against U.S.-supported Israeli genocide in Gaza on campuses across the U.S. and the world. The latest, at Columbia University in New York City, was the site of a previous protest in 1968. That one was against Columbia’s ties to the U.S. military during the Vietnam War and was part of a wave of student protests around the country. It spread to France and helped trigger the great workers’ General Strike of May-June 1968.

The 2024 Columbia students demand:

  1. Divest all finances, including the endowment, from corporations that profit from Israeli apartheid, genocide, and occupation in Palestine.
  2. Complete transparency for all of Columbia’s financial investments.
  3. Amnesty for all students and faculty disciplined or fired in the movement for Palestinian Liberation.

As of April 29, protests have swept across so many campuses that we don’t have the room to list them. We can safely say nothing of this scale has been seen since the May 1970 student strikes against Nixon’s extension of the Vietnam War to Cambodia.

Read more …